I Believe It’s Time To Consider Who Benefits From The Federal Reserve
System
By
Time for change
As I write the title to this post I imagine some corporate “journalist”
reading it and a tape starting to play in his or her mind, saying “Uh oh,
conspiracy theorist alert!”
The term “conspiracy theorist” is what the gatekeepers of the status quo use to
connect in people’s minds those who are skeptical of so-called “conventional
wisdom” with “left wing lunatics”. Here is the formula that everyone must be
made to understand:
Skepticism of conventional wisdom = conspiracy theorist = left wing lunatic.
I wouldn’t ordinarily consider the term “conspiracy theorist” to be offensive,
if it wasn’t uttered with such contempt and used to imply that I am a lunatic.
By the plain English meaning of the phrase, all it refers to is someone who
thinks seriously about conspiracies. Anyone who doesn’t recognize that the
history of the world is filled with conspiracies of major importance hasn’t read
much history. Any American who doesn’t recognize that U.S. history
is filled with conspiracies of major importance simply isn’t paying much
attention.
Consider just our overthrow of the governments of sovereign nations, for
example. Beginning in 1893, we overthrew, helped to overthrow, or went to war
against the legitimate governments of dozens of sovereign nations, including
Hawaii
(1893),
Cuba (1898),
Puerto
Rico (1898), the
Philippines (1899-1902),
Nicaragua (1909),
Honduras
(1912),
Iran (1953),
Guatemala (1954),
Indonesia (1965),
Vietnam (1961-73),
Chile
(1973),
Panama (1989), and Iraq (2003-???). And
William Blum
writes in “A Concise History of US Global Interventions, 1945 to the Present”,
about United States intervention in 11 different Latin American countries during
the Cold War.
I note the above as an introduction to this discussion of the Federal Reserve
because I want to explain why I am skeptical of “conventional wisdom”. Each of
the above noted events were either secret at the time they were carried out, or
they were justified with lies. Though they are now so well doented by
historians that they cannot be refuted, anyone who would have tried to discuss
them at the time they were carried out would have been castigated for lack of
patriotism and branded a “conspiracy theorist”.
My point then is that people who are skeptical of “conventional wisdom” are
generally not lunatics – they are usually simply independent minded people who
have been around long enough and who have paid enough attention to know that
“conventional wisdom” should not be automatically accepted as reality.
What is the Purpose of the Federal Reserve?
I’m not an economist, I don’t know much about economics, and I’ve generally
found reading on the subject to be dry, boring and very difficult to understand.
Nevertheless I recently started reading “The
Creature from Jekyll Island – A Second Look at the Federal Reserve”, by
Edward Griffin, because it was highly recommended to me by a fellow DUer, Larry
Ogg.
Griffin describes the Federal Reserve as a cartel of private banks – meaning a
group of banks joined together in order to maximize profits by reducing
competition through the creation of a monopoly. In the case of the Federal
Reserve, that particular cartel was legalized in 1913 with the enactment of the
Federal Reserve Act of 1913. Of course the U.S. public wouldn’t consciously
enable the creation of a legalized cartel. So the real purpose of the
Federal Reserve System had to be disguised with a purported purpose.
Griffin explains the concept like this:
To cover the fact that a central bank is merely a cartel which has been
legalized, its proponents had to lay down a thick smoke screen of technical
jargon focusing always on how it would supposedly benefit commerce, the
public, and the nation; how it would lower interest rates, provide funding for
needed industrial projects, and prevent panics in the economy. There was not
the slightest glimmer that, underneath it all, was a master plan which was
designed from top to bottom to serve private interests at the expense of the
public.
The Origins of the Federal Reserve System
Griffin describes the idea for the Federal Reserve System as originating in a
highly secret meeting of seven of the wealthiest men in the world, taking place
at Jekyll Island, off the coast of Georgia in 1910. The seven men included one
of our nation’s most powerful U.S. Senators,
Nelson Aldrich, and six bankers. He uses several sources to doent the
highly secret nature of the meeting, including
an article
written by one of its participants, Frank Vanderlip, 22 years after the passage
of the Federal Reserve Act:
I do not feel it is any exaggeration to speak of our secret expedition to
Jekyll Island as the occasion of the actual conception of what eventually
became the Federal Reserve System… We were told to leave our last names behind
us… We were instructed to come one at a time… where Senator Aldrich’s private
rail car would be in readiness…
It was the names of all printed together that would have made our mysterious
journey significant in Washington, in Wall Street, even in London. Discovery,
we knew, simply must not happen, or else all our time and effort would be
wasted. If it were to be exposed publicly that our particular group had got
together and written a banking bill, that bill would have no chance whatever
of passage in Congress.
A Brief Summary of how the System Works
Griffin goes into great detail as to how the system works, and I’ll skip the
great majority of that. This is how he summarizes the plan that emerged from the
Jekyll Island meeting:
What emerged was a cartel agreement with five objectives: 1) stop the growing
competition from the nation’s newer banks; 2) obtain a franchise to create
money out of nothing for the purpose of lending; 3) get control of the
reserves of all banks so that the more reckless ones would not be exposed to
currency drains and bank runs; 4) get the taxpayer to pick up the cartel’s
inevitable losses; 5) and convince Congress that the purpose was to protect
the public.
Griffin explains objective # 4 in a chapter titled “The Name of the Game is
Bailout”:
A primary objective of that cartel was to involve the federal government as an
agent for shifting the inevitable losses from the owners of those banks to the
taxpayers. That of course is one of the more controversial assertions made in
this book. Yet, there is little room for any other interpretation when one
confronts the massive evidence of history since the System was created.
He provides numerous examples of how this has worked. One of the most striking
examples was the failure of Continental Illinois, our nation’s 7th largest bank,
when it failed in 1982. Griffin describes how its irresponsible policies led
to huge profits even as the stage was being set for a massive failure. He
describes the details of the failure, and then:
This was the golden moment… Without government intervention, Continental would
have collapsed, its stockholders would have been wiped out, depositors would
have been badly damaged, and the financial world would have learned that banks
not only have to talk about prudent management, they actually have to
adopt it. Future banking practices would have been severely altered,
and the long-term economic benefit to the nation would have been enormous. But
with government intervention, the discipline of a free market is
suspended, and the cost of failure or fraud is passed to the taxpayers… Banks
can operate recklessly and fraudulently with the knowledge that their
political partners in government will come to their rescue when they get in
trouble…
The final bailout package was a whopper. Basically, the government took over
Continental Illinois and assumed all of its losses ($4.5 billion).
Even as the Bush administration insists it won't risk public funds in a
bailout, American taxpayers may already be liable for billions of dollars
stemming from Federal Reserve and Treasury efforts to quell a financial
crisis.
History suggests the Fed may not recover some of the almost $30 billion
investment in illiquid mortgage securities it received from Bear Stearns Cos.,
said Joe Mason, a Drexel University professor who has written on banking
crises….
The Record of the Federal Reserve System
If the Federal Reserve System really does serve the purpose of stabilizing our
economy then one should be able to point to evidence of that. At least that’s
what a “conspiracy theorist”… I mean a skeptic would say.
Griffin summarizes the record of the Federal Reserve System in stabilizing our
economy:
Since its inception, it has presided over the
crashes of 1921 and
1929;
the
Great Depression of ’29 to ‘39; recessions in
’53,
’57, ’69,
’75,
and
’81; a stock market “Black
Monday” in ’87 (Is it just a coincidence that all those depressions and
recessions began during Republican presidencies?); and a 1000% inflation….
The consequences of wealth confiscation by the Federal-Reserve mechanism are
now upon us. In the current decade (the book was copyrighted in 1994),
corporate debt is soaring; personal debt is greater than ever; both business
and personal bankruptcies are at an all-time high; banks and savings and loan
associations are failing in larger numbers than ever before; interest on the
national debt is consuming half of our tax dollars…
Griffin concludes from this:
That is the scorecard 80 years after Federal Reserve was created supposedly to
stabilize our economy! There can be no argument that the System has failed in
its stated objectives… There has been more than ample opportunity to work out
mere procedural flaws. It is not unreasonable to conclude, therefore, that the
System has failed, not because it needs a new set of rules or more intelligent
directors, but because it is incapable of achieving its stated objectives….
That leads to the question: why is the System incapable of achieving
its stated objectives? The painful answer is: those were never its true
objectives… It becomes obvious that the System is merely a cartel with a
government façade… When there is a conflict between the public interest and
the private needs of the cartel – a conflict that arises almost daily – the
public will be sacrificed. That is the nature of the beast. It is foolish to
expect a cartel to act in any other way….
This view is not encouraged by Establishment institutions and publishers. It
has become their apparent mission to convince the American people that the
system in not intrinsically flawed.
At the time, the conventional wisdom… was that a government institution would
finally harness the “money trust,” disarm its powers, and establish broad
democratic control over money and credit… The results were nearly the
opposite. The money reforms enacted in 1913, in fact, helped to preserve the
status quo… Once the Fed was in operation, the steady diffusion of financial
power halted. Wall Street maintained its dominant position – and even enhanced
it.
My Assessment
As I said above, I’m not an economist, so I am certainly less qualified to
evaluate Griffin’s arguments than a lot of other people.
What about the record of Federal Reserve System failures that Griffin speaks of?
Well, I presume that those who defend the Federal Reserve System would say that
our economic history would have been worse without the System, and that
it was worse before the System was initiated in 1913. I have no way of
evaluating that. So I can’t prove to myself that Griffin is right. But as for
those who would claim that we would be worse off without the Federal Reserve
Act, I would expect them to be able to offer some proof of that, or at least
some strong evidence in favor of that statement. In the absence of such evidence
why should we have a system that requires our federal government to bail out
wealthy banks when they get into trouble?
When large wealthy banks are on the verge of failure, they generally lobby the
federal government to bail them out by claiming that if they fail our economy
will suffer grave damage, there will be millions of unemployed, etc. etc. etc.
Does it seem reasonable that banks would make such claims if they weren’t true?
…. Ok, forget I said that.
The main reason I’m inclined to believe that Griffin’s account is right on the
money for the most part, other than the fact that his book is extremely well
written and meticulously doented with relatively easy to understand examples,
is this: The idea that our government giving billions of dollars to super
wealthy corporations because of their failures somehow serves to
stabilize our economy is…. well…. It sounds so similar to Reagan’s theory of
“trickle down economics” or John McCain’s
economic stimulus plan of cutting the corporate tax rate from 35% to 25%,
claiming that such a tax cut is “essential to U.S. competitiveness”, “will
expand the U.S. economy, creating jobs and opportunities for prosperity”, and
“lead to higher wages”. To believe that kind of stuff is almost in the same
category as believing the Republican assertion that taxing inheritances even
beyond $2 million is necessary to prevent ordinary families from going bankrupt.
To believe that we as a nation have to protect the wealthy from their failures
in order to enjoy a stable economy just seems to me like the epitome of
foolishness. How much extreme income inequality, joblessness and poverty does
our nation have to experience before we wake up and realize what’s going on?
Freedom Press Handbills Help spread the word about George W. Bush and his band of robber barons intent on destroying Democracy in America! Use our growing collection of handbills as a grocery list, then leave it in the shopping cart when you are finished!